[AUUG-Talk]: Conference Update
david.newall at auug.org.au
Tue Sep 25 08:09:48 EST 2007
Leon Brooks wrote:
> Speaking as a *past* member of the LA Committee, I can say
> that at the time, LA were definitely interested in keeping the
> positive as[ects of AUUG intact. but weren't all gung-ho about
> leaping into that breach because we weren't absolutely
> certain that we'd be doing the right thing.
LA is already doing the right thing; its success reflects that.
> My own opinion is that AUUG & LA have different characters,
> and each is useful to different segments of the FOSS & the Unix-
> in-general communities in Oz. However, there is more than
> enough overlap to justify shared organisational structures.
They taste the same to me. The only long-term hope I see for AUUG is
for it to wind up, handing assets to LA, and then for LA to keep AUUG's
name instead of their own! ;-) It's an honorable name, rich in history...
More information about the Talk