[AUUG-Talk]: Wind up AUUG: Objections?

Karl Auer kauer at biplane.com.au
Tue Oct 28 12:06:45 EST 2008

On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:00 +1100, Lawrie Brown wrote:
> Noting all thats said - can I please make it clear that we are ***NOT***
> planning to transfer any assets to any individuals.


The only reason given for incorporation was the need to pass the domain
name to an incorporated body. There are other incs that could well
handle that - LCA would be one - so having an unincorporated group
handle everything else an option, I'd have thought. I'd MUCH rather not
incorporate if we can avoid it.

> The plan is CLEARLY
> to pass them to suitably incorporated associations

Clearly not clear enough! Sorry, I must have missed the memo :-)

If that's the only plan, then the issue of people versus incs is indeed
not relevant.

Regards, K.

Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DD23 0DF3 2260 3060 7FEC 5CA8 1AF6 D9E3 CFEE 6B28

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.auug.org.au/pipermail/talk/attachments/20081028/243eab95/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Talk mailing list