[AUUG-Talk]: Wind up AUUG: Objections?
kauer at biplane.com.au
Tue Oct 28 09:14:54 EST 2008
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 23:14 +1100, Kevin Dawson wrote:
> With winding up, I agree - it's spelt out by both the Constitution and
> the Act. The problem I saw was that we don't have any reference to
> trading or disposing of assets, except that they can't go to members.
Of course assets can go to members! But like any other action we take,
it must be done in good faith, for the good of the association, and
otherwise within the law. We can give assets to anyone we choose,
including members, and for any reason.
The rules and the law are clear that an association cannot be *run* for
the profit of the members, nor to benefit particular individuals. This
is not the case here.
> > But do please give me a pointer to the current constitution...
> http://www.auug.org.au/resources/roles/constitution.shtml , as modified
> by http://www.auug.org.au/resources/roles/change.shtml
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: DD23 0DF3 2260 3060 7FEC 5CA8 1AF6 D9E3 CFEE 6B28
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Talk