[AUUG-Talk]: Wind up AUUG: Objections?
kevind at esi.com.au
Tue Oct 28 00:41:50 EST 2008
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 00:20 +1100, Lawrie Brown wrote:
> Hi Kevin
> I'll address just a couple of brief items before heading to bed.
> And see what response there is by tomorrow.
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:00:51AM +1100, Kevin Dawson wrote:
> > Regarding the membership list, it's not intended as a proper register
> > and it hasn't been updated with any renewals or resignations since the
> I have been given a copy of the current membership list by Peter, and
> it reflects all payments/changes recieved by him to date, it has 27
> members (plus 1 just expired, still in 2 month waiver).
Ahh - so a few renewals this year. Good!
> 2) the formation of a new organisation will clearly distinguish the
> difference between the old and new groups.
This is one thing I don't quite understand - why the need, given that
the new group is specifically intended to preserve the records of the
old and has to mimic its legal structure.
> See the AUUGPS list for more background.
Yes, I've been following it.
Sleep? Is it that time already? :-)
More information about the Talk