[AUUG-Talk]: Wind up AUUG: Objections?
frank at crawford.emu.id.au
Sat Oct 25 20:29:48 EST 2008
Agreed. Some action is needed, even if it is to force a winding up,
since nothing seems to be beating now.
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 20:09 +1100, Kevin Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 18:07 +1100, steve jenkin wrote:
> > David Newall wrote on 22/10/08 4:01 AM:
> > > From the response to my request to the board for contact details, I
> > > believe that AUUG does not have a functioning Board. As a further
> > > result, I believe the only course remaining is to apply to have the
> > > organisation wound up. Does anybody believe differently?
> > This complete public silence is just stunning.
> No, I suspect the complete silence was due to the list itself not
> functioning. I sent a response last week which didn't come back to me -
> indeed, this is the first thing I've seen since then. It may well have
> gone somewhere, but I didn't see it and resolved to find out more when I
> got a chance (which is not right now). I'll repost if need be.
> However, some of the sentiments you've expressed are right - we have to
> Do Something (which means the 24 of us who are still current members).
> Talk - The AUUG discussion list.
> Talk at auug.org.au
More information about the Talk