[AUUG-Talk]: Re: AUUG membership - confirming email address

[David Newall]

David Lloyd wrote:
>
> David,
>
> David Newall wrote:
>> David Lloyd wrote:
>>> The reasonable argument is that the Lions Award constitutes enough
>>> money for people to fight over.
>> How is that reasonable?
>
> We can validly assume that a postal ballot conducted with real paper,
> and delivery by the Australian Postal service is going to be valid.
> Even if the new rules become disallowed.
>
> The number of people who can vote is small and I don't think the
> $100-200 (or even LESS) to do this -- just to ensure it is absolutely
> right and waterproof -- is too onerous to ask.

What has that got to do with the Lions Award money?  What's the
reasonable argument there?