[AUUG-Talk]: Proxy vote to Christopher Vance

[Karl Auer]

On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:17 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Personally I doubt whether these "proxies" are even valid, as there is no 
> authentication whatsoever.  Didn't we have a conference along these lines 
> or something?

Well, I PGP signed mine, and anyone who wishes can go along whatever
validation path they choose with that.

> Also, no body of which I've been a member has allowed secondary proxies 
> i.e. if not A then B.

Really? How odd. About the only usual rule is that the intent of the
proxying party be clear, and that only one person be able to cast the
proxy vote.

This is the NSW model rules, for example.

"Each member is to be entitled to appoint another member as proxy by
notice given to the secretary no later than 24 hours before the time of
the meeting in respect of which the proxy is appointed."

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DD23 0DF3 2260 3060 7FEC 5CA8 1AF6 D9E3 CFEE 6B28
Public key at  : random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.auug.org.au/pipermail/talk/attachments/20071211/b455f43b/attachment.pgp>