[AUUG-Talk]: Attention auug.org.au administrators

[Jon Wright]

Actually I thought the Dalai Lama defence ran only second to the  
"nazi" accusation in web forums :-)


On 23/12/2007, at 8:13 PM, James Purser wrote:

>
> On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 18:32 +1030, David Newall wrote:
>> Okay, let me ask the question I really meant: Why does it need to be
>> upgraded?  Being ancient is not a reason.  The Dalai Lama is arguably
>> ancient, but he doesn't need upgrading.  (Eventually he'll be dead,  
>> and
>> then he will need, and obtain, an upgrade.)
>
> This forever shall be known as the Dalai Lama defence and shall usurp
> the Chewbacce defence in its popular culture impact!
> -- 
> James Purser <james at jamespurser.com.au>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk - The AUUG discussion list.
> Talk at auug.org.au
> http://www.auug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/talk