[AUUG-Talk]: A note on points of order

[Karl Auer]

On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 23:53 +1030, David Newall wrote:
> You can't ignore the requirement to follow due process.  This can't be
> done ad-hoc because that's not allowed.

You are quite right; and I would normally be right behind you in calling
for I's to be dotted and T's to be crossed. Nor am I suggesting "ad
hoc-ery".

In a few months or a year, the only people apparently willing or able to
do anything with AUUG will be gone. Unless we have reason to suspect
actual bad faith (in which case we should point it out), it seems to me
that we should let them do their thing, and be a bit flexible about the
rules, provided the spirit of those rules is being followed.

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DD23 0DF3 2260 3060 7FEC 5CA8 1AF6 D9E3 CFEE 6B28
Public key at  : random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.auug.org.au/pipermail/talk/attachments/20071212/8843fa32/attachment.pgp>