[Talk] SCO Linux kernel still being distributed
Greg 'groggy' Lehey
Greg.Lehey at auug.org.au
Sun Jul 27 13:31:47 EST 2003
On Sunday, 27 July 2003 at 13:16:58 +1000, David Keegel wrote:
> Groggy wrote:
>> The trouble is that they don't yet appear to be doing anything
>> illegal. They haven't made any statement at all in Australia. Even
>> if they were to demand license fees, it would only be illegal if it
>> could be shown that they did not, indeed, own Linux. We know that
>> they don't, but the courts don't.
> Here is an interesting section of the TPA:
> TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974 - SECT 52
> Misleading or deceptive conduct
> A corporation shall not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct
> that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.
> But I don't think the ACCC would consider it to be "in trade or
> commerce" unless SCO/Caldera actually sends out demands for money to
Yes, that's pretty much what they said.
> Whether the ACCC took any action after that would depend on the
> wording of the demand (how misleading or deceptive it seemed to
They sounded pretty keen on going for it if they actually were to send
out demands. I suppose the real issue is that they don't see the
dangers of FUD; or maybe they do, in which case we can expect to hear
from them. I put in my complaint as myself, but I did point out that
I was President of AUUG and that this greatly concerned our members.
We'll see if anything happens.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Talk